We'll show you exactly how AI is impacting your speed and code quality.




A feature that didn't ship this sprint is a story point that moved to the next one. Whether it spilled because of a review bottleneck, a scope change, or a codebase that required three days of rework to touch — none of that is visible in the Jira ticket.
How much of last quarter's engineering effort went to new features versus fixing existing ones? Most product leaders can't answer this — and can't make an accurate capacity commitment to stakeholders until they can.
Bugs accumulate quietly across Jira projects. By the time inflow outpaces resolution, a release timeline is already at risk. There's no cross-project view to catch it earlier.




Yes. The investment view lets you switch between work item, epic, product, and allocation views — all filterable by sprint or date range. Drill from the sprint delivery summary into specific epics to see which ones completed, which spilled, and which were added mid-sprint.
Rework is code modified or deleted within 30 days of being originally written — covering bug fixes caught in QA, scope changes mid-sprint, and integration failures. The 30-day window aligns to a typical 2-3 week sprint cycle. Code modified after 30 days is classified as maintenance. Both signal different upstream problems worth addressing in planning.
Yes. The bug inflow view supports multi-project selection — choose any combination of Jira projects and see issue type distribution grouped by time or by project. This gives product leaders a cross-product quality view that individual Jira boards can't provide.


.png)



















.png)










See exactly how AI-assisted code is impacting your delivery speed and code quality, before you commit to anything.
Trusted by 1000+ teams