We'll show you exactly how AI is impacting your speed and code quality.




A high spender can be a power user or an expensive churner. SURGE surfaces the patterns survey data never catches and joins spend to merged output, so the number you act on reflects value delivered, not activity logged.
See how Spend is measured →
Track the complete lifecycle of AI-generated code from the IDE straight through to production. By analyzing long-term engagement patterns, SURGE automatically clusters developers into distinct adoption archetypes: Fast & Sustained, Fast Then Cliff, or Slow Then Stick to reveal true organizational behavioral shifts.
See how Utilization is measured →
Recovery surfaces the recoverable AI spend across idle licenses, model mismatch, overlapping tools, and zombie agents. Every dollar tied to a cause, every cause traceable to a team, ready for procurement.
See how Recovery is measured →
Gain shows AI-assisted PRs merged, AI code percentage, and acceptance rate from real production data. Skip the IDE counters and survey estimates. Measures what reached production and what each delivered change actually cost.
See how Gains is measured →
Efficiency is where SURGE delivers the bottom line. Efficiency Multiplier, Cost per PR, AI-Assisted PRs Merged, and Rework Rate, calibrated continuously. The board-grade AI ROI number every engineering investment conversation needs.
See how Efficiency is measured →
Spend, Utilization, Recovery, Gains, Efficiency — five pillars that measure the full value chain from AI investment to delivered engineering output. The E does double duty as the audience anchor: the framework is built for engineering teams.
DORA's framework is a calculator powered by survey-based assumptions. SURGE replaces those assumptions with real telemetry from 100,000+ engineers — the output is a measured benchmark, not an estimate. We adopt DORA's amplifier thesis and J-curve directly, then measure what DORA could only estimate.
Recovery aggregates five waste patterns most orgs can't see: idle licenses with near-zero activity, multiple paid tools on one seat where only one gets used, premium models used for low-value tasks, contracts committed above actual burn, and abandoned or zombie agents still calling APIs.
Hivel's AI Code Telemetry classifies merged code as AI-generated or human-written directly from PR diffs — tool-agnostic, with no IDE plugin dependency. It catches contributions from Copilot, Cursor, Claude, and ChatGPT, including code pasted in from chat tools.
No. Each pillar serves a specific audience. Spend and Recovery are Finance and Procurement conversations. Utilization and Gains are platform and engineering-leader conversations. Efficiency is the board conversation. The framework holds across all of them.


.png)



















.png)










Uncover which engineering teams are driving real code attribution & prove concrete AI value to the board.
Trusted by 1000+ teams